To Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton: You are Invited to Participate in “A Real 9/11 Commission”

In May 2006, a Zogby International national poll found that 42 percent of adults polled
believe the U.S. government and the 9/11 Commission "concealed or refused to investigate
critical evidence" that contradicts the official explanation of the attacks. And, 9/11 Commission
chairs Republican Thomas Kean and Democrat Lee Hamilton, say in their new book
"Without Precedent": 'The Sept. 11 commission was so frustrated with repeated misstatements
by the Pentagon and FAA about their response to the 2001 terror attacks that it considered
an investigation into possible deception'.

Tuckahoe, NY (PRWEB) October 19, 2006 -- As author Paul J. Landis announces updates and an
updated title to his book “A Real 9/11 Commission,” “it seemed appropriate to suggest that
Me. Kean and Hamilton join the 42% of us who ‘believe the U.S. government and the 9/11
Commission "concealed or refused to investigate critical evidence" that contradicts the
official explanation of the attacks.’ There is significant new information and additional
content covering a number of critical current issues, Landis told us, thus justifying the new title
“A Real 9/11 Commission Will Help Free America, Now”(ISBN 0-9760408-1-6, April
2005; US $14.75, UK, £ 10.2,, now available.

In addition to the 42% above, Landis told us, the same May 2006 national Zogby respondents
say “More than 40 percent of Americans believe that the 9/11 Commission Report that
investigated the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks is a cover-up”.

Wow! And now, hold on to you hats: based upon a review of their book “Without Precedent”, we
have significant doubts being expressed by these two 9/11 commissioners: Join us Mr. Kean
and Mr. Hamilton in “A Real 9/11 Investigation”.

“A Real 9/11 Commission” or if you like, a new, trustworthy 9/11 commission, what would
it do differently?

Participants in “A Real 9/11 Commission”,, are invited to review
evidence, before it gets filtered by Bush and Cheney or removed from our controlled
mainstream media. They are invited to see documentaries of footage that was shown on live
TV the morning of 9/11.

How would or could, Don Rumsfeld prove to the American people that the 757 he says hit the
Pentagon really did? If asked, participants in “A Real 9/1 Commission” would say,
“he can’t!” Not only are there NO pictures showing a 60 to 80 ton 757 on the lawn of the
Pentagon, we would play for Don the 9/11 AM CNN Live report on Loose Change 2nd edition
“there is no evidence that a 757 has hit anywhere near the Pentagon!”

We would also remind Don that the famous collapsed Pentagon wall section, if that is where
he tells us the plane is? That section collapsed twenty minutes after the explosion. Did the
757 just wait around for a hole to climb into?

So Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton, any comments?

The New York City Twin Towers, where 3,000 people lost their lives, we were told ‘collapsed’
because of the planes that hit them. If we asked Don or Dick Cheney to prove this, what
could they use? There is a NTST report that supports this claim. But does the evidence
support this report?

Briefly: No. We now know that molten steel, 3,000 degrees, was found in the sub-basements of
both Towers (and WTC 7) four and five weeks after their collapse. We can only suggest in the
space available here, that the reader look at the Special Report at and in “A Real 9/11 Commission Will Help
Free America Now” on pages 63 to 76. You will see photographs of the building ‘collapse’ and
can compare these pictures with live TV statements by TV news reporters. We have pictures of
multi-ton steel columns projected horizontally into near-by buildings and multi-ton steel
structures thrown 600 feet or two football fields away from the ‘collapse’. Is this how you
would envision the ‘collapse’ of the massive structures?

And photographs of the Towers ‘collapse’ with the sounds of the ‘demolition charges’, would
that help Don and Dick? Obviously not: “911 Eyewitness”, by Mr. Ricard
A. Siegel.

We might ask the commissions: How is it that the collapse of these structures produced only
pulverized debris and steel beams conveniently cut into sections that fit on the backs of
the trucks used to haul them away. And if the Towers ‘collapsed’, where did the 2,600
pollutants come from that have thus far claimed the lives of twelve “First Responders” and
caused 70,000 illnesses?

For the assertion that Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania, we will just suggest you see
statements by coroners on the scene in Pennsylvania saying “there was no blood or evidence
of human remains at the site”, Loose Change 2nd Edition,

So Don and Dick appear to have no EVIDENCE to justify the statements they made. How about
Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton, perhaps they want to explain their lapse of finding the above
EVIDENCE or any EVIDENCE that the 42% of poll respondents say was ignored?

On a Book TV interview about their book “Without Precedent”, Mr. Hamilton states, “we were
there to tell the story.” Unfortunately, the moderator, Mr. Marvin Kalb was too busy being
polite and never asked: “What story? The one Bush and Cheney told us or the one
substantiated by facts?”

“Very recommended,” Landis told us: “Be sure to check out the great work done by Lynn Pentz
and the L.A. Citizens’ Grand Jury. Their results, note this Mr. Kean and Mr. Hamilton, match
the above:

To you, the news media people reading this, I hope you will suggest that your readers
participate in “A Real 9/11 Commission”. The evidence needed is available in this book and
on-line at, including the ability to “render a decision”.

“We the People” were lied to about the events of 9/11. We were lied to by the same people
who recently made us ‘Torturers’, who are using their own Weapon of Mass Destruction, a
radioactive weapon called Depleted Uranium that is killing OUR soldiers and causing their
wives to give birth to deformed babies. We were lied to by the same people who have their
own Non-U.S. Constitution – the “Project for the New American Century”. These people are not
Osama bin Laden or Al-Quaida. They are Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their friends who support
the Non-U.S. Constitution the “Project for the New American Century” – the motivation for
the attacks of 9/11/2001.

Opinion split over 9/11 report by: Keith Phucas, Times Herald Staff, 05/28/2006

Book: “Without Precedent" - Sept. 11 Panel Doubted Officials
By HOPE YEN The Associated Press August 4, 2006

The Constitution of Bush and Cheney is not the Constitution of the United States.
Major articles about their Non-U.S. Constitution:

Press Contact: Paul Landis
Company Name:
More Information:


Site Search
Advanced Search